This page was last updated on Monday, 02 September, 2013.

Exactly Which Criminals Should be Disarmed?

Scan Data Matrix to record web site and contact information for Mr. Steve JohnsonAt the time of this writing, Senator Diane Feinstein, D-CA, has just introduced an anti-gun bill that bans approximately 150 types of guns, bans normal capacity magazines and contains many other outrageous provisions designed to do nothing but disarm law abiding Americans. In her own words:

'It exempts assault weapons that are "lawfully possessed" as of the date the bill is enacted, but sales of exempted weapons would be subject to background checks.

"No weapon is taken from anyone," Feinstein said. "The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over time."

Feinstein said getting the bill through Congress will be "an uphill battle," but she said it would be "a battle worth having." :

Senator Feinstein, who herself legally carries a concealed weapon in her home state, has been a virulent anti-gunner for many years and is a darling of the leftist media in this country. The hypocrisy of Sen. Feinstein carrying a weapon seems to be lost on most people. It should absolutely be seen as a glaring example of what she and her ilk have in mind for the rest of us! They will be armed and we will not be!

The framers of the Constitution were unambiguous about their intentions when they constructed the 2nd Amendment: '...the right of the People to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.' Ms. Feinstein is unambiguous about her intentions as well. She intends to disarm law abiding Americans and gut the 2nd Amendment right out of the Constitution!

On December 11th, 2012 the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that Illinois' total ban on carrying firearms for self-defense outside the home or business is unconstitutional. (NRA 1st Freedom magazine, February 2013 issue.)

Thankfully, the Seventh Circuit Judges got it right. The Heller decision by SCOTUS also got it right. Ms. Feinstein is very aware of these facts and will go 'all in' to press her agenda to 'dry up the supply of these weapons over time.'

Is the Senator conspiring to break the law? Is she engaging in a criminal activity? Is she unfit to execute her duties and sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?

Like Ms. Feinstein, I have a concealed carry permit and I use it for the very same reason she does. Namely, to protect myself and my family from harm. She's no more or less of a law abiding citizen than I am in that regard. The essential difference between law abiding citizens and the ruling elite who intend to subvert the Constitution is that I take very seriously my obligation as a law abiding citizen to protect myself, my family and the Constitution from all enemies.

If you had to choose, who would you rather be armed? Me or Ms. Feinstein?℠ (Right-side navigation page SSI insertion)