Agenda 21 Revealed – You Need to Know This
Agenda 21 Revealed – You Need to Know This | Lucille Femine
Originally Published in the Las Vegas Guardian Express on 21 September, 2013
Reprinted with written permission of author
Agenda 21 is a major tool of the New World order, conceived in 1992 in Rio DeJaniero at the “Earth Summit.” Its original name, “Sustainable Development”, began in 1987 with Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party. Heavily promoted to the public as the salvation for this planet and every human being, it is anything but that. It needs to be revealed in no uncertain terms so you know what it truly is.
By putting this data out here, I might be labeled a prominent member of the lunatic fringe but I believe we have an ethical obligation to present truth, as we see it. If I’m wrong – well, I’ll be embarrassed but then I’ll be relieved because maybe this insanity won’t happen after all.
However, there is growing evidence this rotten egg called Agenda 21 has been hatching for quite some time, under our very noses. And it stinks.
At that momentous meeting, 178 nations signed the document; President Bush signed for the U.S. Later President Clinton signed an executive order, basically demanding compliance from every state and community with the goals and plans of Agenda 21 which is fast coming about as official policy in every town, city and state
Compassionate-sounding terms like “Population Stabilization” and “Sustainable Development” are simply masks for the true purpose of this United Nations plan – a world domination of your life and liberty, basically an insidious plot to control any and all parts of existence.
According to its authors, sustainability focuses on three things: “global land use, global education and global population control and reduction”. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it? However, in actual practice, these concepts pan out far below their lofty rhetoric.
The true objectives of Agenda 21, revealed, include an end to national sovereignty; restructure of the family unit which means basically the state will take care of your children, with a keen eye toward indoctrinating them into state control over family allegiance; abolition of private property with citizens crammed into “stack and pack”, hi-rise apartment buildings, close to railroad tracks while cars will not be allowed.
Santa Cruz has already been granted 300 million federal dollars to build these apartment buildings. In exchange for their willingness to participate in these sustainable acts, they are given immunity to construction-defect liability.
In Washington, one of these hi-risers is a nine story building with no elevators, where tenants share a bath and kitchen with seven other tenants.
Santa Cruz has been the test case for putting Agenda 21 on the whole map. Speaking of maps, there is a very startling one which shows the aim of the Wildlands Project, part of Agenda 21 – how fifty percent of the country, under this new system, will be off-limits to humans, while most of the rest of the land will be highly controlled. There are little black spots on the map which show the locations of all the high-risers which will be built.
Agenda 21’s logo centers around three symbols which represent “Es”. The first one is Equity which uses law to change justice from social to equal. The idea of the “Precautionary Principle” means one is not allowed to harm anything, even small animals and even on one’s own property.
The second one is Economy which will replace free enterprise with public/private partnerships. In other words, as Hitler called it, Fascism.
The third is Environmental which basically puts nature above man.
The main focus of Agenda 21 is to take control of the land because once they do that, they can control any human activity.
Then there’s Global Citizenship Education Program, evidenced in the “No Child Left Behind” program. Our children will be educated into collectivism.
The third is control over and great reduction of population; whoever is left will be congregated in those crowded communities of hi-risers.
These globalists present the notion that the world population should not be more than 500 million. That means 93% of the existing population would have to be eliminated. How do you suppose they intend to accomplish that? Or have been accomplishing it?
The Democratic and Republican parties are both in favor of World Government. The strategy is to go from global to local, infusing every state and community with their programs. These are done with help of ICLEI, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Many in this group have been insinuating themselves into local governments to implement Agenda 21 policies and directives, all to the detriment of that city or community. As of 2011, they have moved into several cities in almost every state in the Union.
Harvey Ruvin, vice-chairman of ICLEI once said, “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” That is eerily, historically familiar.
The good news is they are being fought hard – on that same local level. In Alabama last year, the governor banned any and all sustainability projects of the UN from being enforced in the state. It’s a law, Senate Bill 477, passed unanimously.
“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” said Justice Gilpin-Green about this win in Alabama. Further, he said, ”It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”
In New Hampshire, work is being none on a similar measure.
In Arizona, 2012, the bill prohibiting any UN sustainability passed in the Senate and looks like it’s a go in the House.
This is the only way to beat them, as individuals, members of a community, city or state; do everything possible to ban Agenda 21 from an area.
This is how Alabama did it because the governor, who was not willing to give up federal funding, was finally won over by a grassroots protest.
That’s the carrot they dangle – federal funding. It’s no better than welfare and much more deadly to our freedom because it’s only meant to control and suppress on a grander scale than has ever existed before.